Home | Ketchikan | Alaska | Sports | Waterfront | Business | Education | Religion | Scene
Classifieds | Place a class ad | PDF Edition | Home Delivery

Alaskans speak up when it comes to the Alaska Permanent Fund dividend and...

Our best wishes go to the high school wrestlers participating the Region V...

Luella May Couture, 75, died Dec. 8, 2019, in Ketchikan. She was born on May 30, 1944, in Monroe, Washington.
PoV: Revenue dept. needs commissioner 100% aligned with gov.


I know this message might be getting old for some but many Alaskans have lost perspective on the positive position we find ourselves in.

Yes, we’ve suffered through some serious “political paralysis” over the past year but the message is worth repeating.

Alaska truly is blessed with amazing resources and a healthy balance sheet. Our Alaska Permanent Fund is approaching $70 billion and spins off annual revenue supporting 50% of government spending, and a cash dividend to every Alaskan who qualifies.

We are expecting final investment decisions soon on two projects that will add 250,000-300,000 barrels per day to the pipeline. We’re the envy of most states and many small countries. The frantic, sometimes unhinged debate that’s taken place over the past year would lead outsiders to think our economy is on par with bankrupt states in the Lower 48. Nothing could be further from the truth.

While painful, the past year’s healthy debate is necessary and was a long time coming. Like it or not, Gov. Dunleavy did exactly what he campaigned on: reduce the massive size of government, fight for a full PFD, and not take hard-earned cash from your pocket through new tax schemes. Dunleavy still believes in these principles. Over the past several decades we’ve been blessed with the ability (and cash!) to be all things to all people. Many people realize we’ve had a strong run, but things must change. Many others think this gravy train can keep on chugging. However, Alaska can no longer afford the budgets constructed and funded through one revenue stream over the past 30-plus years.

The discussion is turning towards taxes. I’ll admit that I’m on the record stating that someday Alaska will have a broad-based tax. However, I always followed up by stating this decision should be years if not decades down the road, well past my tenure as commissioner of Revenue.

Step one must continue to be fiscal discipline to get our spending habits adjusted. That must be accomplished well before we implement any sort of tax. My concern is that once a tax is on the books, the budget in place at that time will be the new base going forward. Cutting below that will be nearly impossible and the budget will only go up from there. I believe our population and workforce is far too small to provide the level of revenue we’d need to extract from working Alaskans to continue a “business as usual” approach to budgeting, which includes the PFD.

We’ve all heard the many angles and perspectives on the PFD: it’s a God-given right; it’s a welfare check; it’s free money; reducing it is a “tax;” it’s our birthright. Regardless of where you stand on the PFD issue or government spending in general, it all comes down to math. The math is simple but unfortunately does not balance despite the governor’s best efforts: Government spending/services plus PFD does not equal currently available revenue. I give Gov. Dunleavy tremendous kudos for tackling government spending, and trust he’ll keep up the battle.  

As the commissioner of Revenue, I look at any potential tax and its interaction with current revenue streams and budget expenditures as a fairly simple exercise. The politics and policy are extremely difficult, but the math is simple.

A new tax means the Department of Revenue will have to create a bureaucracy to extract revenue from the private sector. Or in the case of an oil-tax change, take more money from the companies willing to invest the billions we as a state don’t have, yet is required to monetize our resources. Any new tax will be used to sustain this unsustainable budget, as well as provide the revenue to distribute PFD checks every October as the Department of Revenue has done for 38 years.

When I accepted the job of Revenue commissioner, I did so based on a path forward in which the math allowed for available revenues to be split between a healthy but reduced government and provide net-positive revenue to Alaskans through the PFD. It’s apparent that many people haven’t accepted that our three decades of spending patterns cannot continue.

I have loved serving the State of Alaska and Gov. Dunleavy as commissioner of Revenue. I’ll never forget the sage advice Dunleavy gave to his commissioners at one of our first cabinet meetings. To paraphrase, he said, just run our departments. Don’t let the policy/politics swirling around get in the way of us doing our most important job — serving Alaskans.

I have been blessed with the best department in Alaska and really wish it was that simple. But my department will be at the heart of all discussions this session as it usually is and I want the governor to have someone who is 100% aligned with his vision. I have therefore notified the governor that I will be resigning from his cabinet. I will continue in my position for as long as he needs so a smooth transition can take place. I will remain optimistic about Alaska’s future but we must agree to start walking down this path together not for our own perceived immediate needs but for the tremendous future that I believe Alaska will continue to have.

Bruce Tangeman is commissioner of the Alaska Department of Revenue.