Home | Ketchikan | Alaska | Sports | Waterfront | Business | Education | Religion | Scene
Classifieds | Place a class ad | PDF Edition | Calendar | Discussions | Moderated Chat | Home Delivery| How to cancel

When the euphoria dissipates, Alaska will realize that the pot in which it has positioned itself is boiling over.

Reduce. Reuse. Reap a little cash on the side? One of the unpleasant indignities of living on an island in Southeast Alaska is that we are forced — in a very tangible way — to confront how much waste we create. That confrontation comes in the form of a bill. With space at premium, we pay to bale, ship and dispose of much of our trash inside Washington state.

Robert Eugene Chapman, 60, died Feb. 14, 2015, in Ketchikan.
Frances “Pat” Bailey Koons, 82, died Feb. 22, 2015, in Ketchikan.
Value culture
Allowances should be made for traditional Alaska Native artwork containing bird parts.

Say what? For those unfamiliar with Alaska Native traditions, one tradition is to create art containing non-edible migratory bird parts.

It's been done for as long as the Natives have been in Alaska — a very long time.

Congressman Don Young has introduced legislation to amend the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. The amendment would make allowances for Native art featuring feathers, bones and other bird parts.

The need for amending the act came to Young's attention a couple of years ago when the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service cited a well-known Tlingit artist for including feathers in a piece of commercial art. The artist might have served time, but he settled with the federal government for a fine of a couple of thousand dollars instead.

In response, the Alaska Federation of Natives asked for a legislative allowance. The legislation will be discussed next in the House's Natural Resources Committee.

But, it should be pointed out to that committee and the whole House, which Young likely will do, the absurdity of fining or jailing an Alaska artist for using feathers and the like.

It isn't unusual to come across a feather left by a bird and laying on the ground in Alaska. Alaskans, whether Native or not, shouldn't be in danger of citation or jail time because they picked it up, and, in the case of Natives, added it to a traditional art piece.

Nor should the Natives be prevented from acquiring feathers, bones and other dead-bird parts for art.

The Natives employ their artistic talents mostly in villages around the state in order to make a living. For those in the villages, their livelihood shouldn't be compromised by a federal law.

As much as this nation is comprised of different cultures coming together to live as one, it is a place where separate heritages and cultures are valued. The Native culture is valuable to not only Alaska, but the United States.

Young's amendment amounts to common sense for American Natives who have accommodated other cultures in recent times.