Home | Ketchikan | Alaska | Sports | Waterfront | Business | Education | Religion | Scene
Classifieds | Place a class ad | PDF Edition | Calendar | Discussions | Moderated Chat | Home Delivery| How to cancel


Hikers have been all over the news this weekend for all the wrong reasons. In the Sierra Nevada wilderness, a woman was stranded for nine days after breaking her leg. She spent two of those days slowly crawling toward a creek for water. In Alaska, a stranded hiker was rescued on Friday by Juneau Mountain Rescue and Southeast Alaska Dogs Organized for Ground Search.

Read more...
Alaska 1, Ohio 0. The week started out in Alaska's favor when President Obama decided to heed Alaskans' call to rename North America's tallest peak.

Read more...
1/7/2014
Endangered species

The Endangered Species Act celebrated its 40th birthday recently.

The law came about in an effort to protect species from extinction and to restore those threatened to a vibrant status.

It took effect in 1973, along with a conservation movement that has affected not only species, but economic development. It has pitted developers against conservationists, and caused frustration in trying to balance preserving species and making a living.

The law has been applied to protect whales, sea turtles, corals and salmon, among others. It has been successful in that species listed decades ago were delisted in the 1990s and again now. The Eastern Steller sea lion is one example coming off the list.

Congress has amended the act four times. Among the changes, it added plants to the conservation law and exempted the Department of Defense from critical habitat designations.

Like other laws that prompt a ream of regulations, it can be used to good or bad. In some cases, it has served the nation well by preserving species that might have gone extinct. But in other cases, it has been misused to impede and shut down development.

The act is as good or not-so-good as the intentions of those who apply it.